I looked at the work of three photographers who use autobiographical self-portraiture in their work: Francesca Woodman, Elina Brotherus and Gillian Wearing.
Francesca Woodman
Francesca Woodman was a troubled person – she sadly committed suicide at the age of just 22 years. She was a prolific photographer and her family now have some 800 images which she took during her short life. It is a tragedy that anyone should be so troubled that they would take their own life and I felt very sad looking at the images in the series Space2. And ironically, her work only became well known and accepted after her death.
I knew she had taken her life before I looked at her series Space2, and I’m not sure I would have grasped that she was so troubled just by looking at the images. I think the narrative is part of these images, and helps me to understand why she created them.
Anyone suffering from depression so severely is, by the very nature of the illness, totally self centred, therefore in the case of Woodman, I do not consider these images are created as a result of self indulgence or narcissistic tendencies. It is likely that her thoughts were confined to the boundaries of her depression, and in the series Space2 she was expressing those thoughts. The images in which she is almost not there, a ghost image, or a blur, indicate to me that she felt an outsider, a misfit, not part of conventional society. Hiding behind wall paper, posing naked, tells me that she was expressing her feelings of vulnerability.
I don’t believe think she was addressing wider issues because her depression would probably have prevented her from thinking about anything outside her immediate world.
Elina Brotherus
In her series Annonciation, Elina Brotherus used photography to express her sadness of her failed attempts at IVF, and I think that unlike Woodman her aim was to tell others of her experiences and sadness. In an interview quoted in the course text she says she prefers to tell her story through photographs as she is still too sad to give interviews. I looked through her series as she progresses through each attempt at IVF, and felt she had stripped her inner feelings from her body as she worked through the photographic story. I felt that the images in which she is naked show her as losing everything, even the protection of her clothes.
This is not a journey in the world of narcissim or self-indulgence, but the telling of a story. She says that so often we see the success stories surrounding IVF but not the sadness surrounding failed attempts. 3 particular images caught my attention:
Annonciation 14: she is sitting in a bathroom with a figure in the background. She has her back to this person, and is alone in her grief. Who is that person, her partner, a doctor? We will never know.
Annonciation 21, New York. This is the only image, apart from Annonciation 14, which includes a male figure, presumably her partner. In all other images she is alone, showing just how failed IVF can become all consuming to the point that a loving relationship becomes secondary to the task in hand.
Annonciation 27: this is the only image where she is smiling, as though she has a secret but can’t tell anyone yet. Did she think this time the treatment has worked? But we know it didn’t because the series progresses with further failures.
A desperately sad set of images but with an important message: IVF is not always successful and these stories are often left untold.
Brotherus went on to create a series Carpe-Fucking-Diem in which she starts moving on and realizing that she will remain childless, but that the world goes on as normal, regardless. She photographed herself in ordinary situations, and in some cases, with humour that was not seen in Annonciation. Some of these images were taken during her IVF treatment but mostly after she had come to terms with failed IVF.
A man, presumably her partner, appears in several photographs, which indicated to me that their relationship had changed, he was no longer excluded from her world of grief. I felt that she was using the process of creating this series as therapy and closure.
Gillian Wearing
Wearing followed a number of photographers in focusing on family as well as self-portrait, combining the two. She set out to create a series of images by creating masks resembling members of her family, with the eyes cut out, and then photographed herself wearing them. She was inspired by the work of Claude Cahun, and her work was displayed alongside Cahun’s work at the National Portrait Gallery in 2017. Cahun like Wearing created images using masks, using them in self-portraiture.
This departure from the usual “selfie” indicates to me that Wearing was not doing this for narcissistic reasons but to show that roles in families are interchangeable, everyone can put on the persona of another member of the family. I felt that the process of making the masks was as important to Wearing as taking the photographs of the end product.

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2012/mar/27/gillian-wearing-takeover-mask
The three photographers shown here, although all working in self-portraiture, have different ways of working and different reasons for producing this type of image.